OK, I've been lurking for awhile and am about to pull the trigger on building my own mattress. But I am very indecisive and would greatly appreciate input from all of you that have experience with latex. I am building a 12" Eastern King mattress to be placed upon a 14" solid platform bed frame. I've spent hours reading on this forum and researching assorted options with various online vendors. I've come to the following conclusions thus far. #1 — I think I'll take a shot at latex (though I must confess I've been very tempted to try to recreate the Tempurpedic Cloud Supreme after my wife and I tried one at a mattress store a few weeks ago and she really liked it). I'm drawn by fact that good quality latex mattress components seem to last a LONG time. #2 — I want LI "Talatech" Talalay blend latex for at least the top portion of my latex. #3 — Any PU foam used will be 2.8 lbs/cu ft density from foamdistributing.com. They have a 36 ILD medium foam and a 55 ILD firm foam. What I can't decide upon is how much latex to use. I have basically come up with four price points using four varying levels of latex/PU foam. I'd love to get your opinions/feedback on what you think. Here are the options, with the proposed layers listed from the bottom up. BTW, my wife and I are 5'10" and 6' respectively, we each weigh 160-165 lbs. and we're both side sleepers. Option #1, $779 (9" PU, 3" Latex) — 4" 55 ILD PU, 2.5" 55 ILD PU eggcrate (for airflow), 3" 36 ILD PU, 3" 24 ILD (soft) Talatech latex Option #2, 1042 (6" PU, 6" Latex) — 4" 55 ILD PU, 2.5" 55 ILD PU eggcrate (for airflow), 3" 32 ILD (medium) Talatech latex, 3" 24 ILD (soft) Talatech latex Option #3, $1209 (3" PU, 8.5" Latex) — 3" 55 ILD PU, 5.5" Dunlop Latex 3-Zone Core (32/36/32 ILD), 3" 24 ILD (soft) Talatech latex Option #4, $1473 (11.5" Latex) — 5.5" Dunlop Latex 3-Zone Core (32/36/32 ILD), 3" 32 ILD (medium) Talatech latex, 3" 24 ILD (soft) Talatech latex Because I'm concerned about whether my wife and I will really like sleeping on latex, I'm very tempted to go with option #1. If we really like it, we can always replace those foam components when they wear out in a few years or so with latex. Also, according to SleepEZ's web site, their latex mattress components (made by LI) have a 30-day money back guarantee, so this makes any of the four options a little less scary in case we don't like latex or we need to change some firmnesses, etc. Options #3 and #4 would use an affordable 100% natural Dunlop latex core from Arizona Premium Mattress Company. I'm really concerned, though... wouldn't 3" of soft latex on top of either 5.5" of medium latex (#3) or 8.5" of medium latex (#4) simply be too soft? I talked with Shaun at SleepEZ (he's very helpful, just as so many of you have attested) and he recommended 3" soft/3" medium/3" firm top-to-bottom. From what I've read here on the forums, some of you have found even this combination to be too soft, so I don't know what 3" soft over 5.5" or more of medium would be like. Maybe 2" soft over the 5.5" medium would be better? By the way, the 3" latex layer(s) in options #2, #3 and #4 will actually be a 2" layer plus a 1" layer of the same density totalling 3"... this will allow considerably greater flexibility in configuring the mattress. Also, do you think the LI Talalay blend is the way to go, or should I pay the premium and get the LI Natural Talalay? I'm not convinced that the natural is necessarily better than the blended. Well, that's it. If you got this far, you probably have some input for me, so fire away! This message was modified May 22, 2010 by pianoman
|
Leo3, where did you get your Latex Green Dunlop 15 ILD from? |
Diane, at O-stock. You are too light weight for the stuff though and that is a good thing, wish I was, LOL. Unless you are going to use it at the bottom of your layers. |
Thanks - I was just curious as I hadn't seen it anywhere. |
Diane, Sleepeze carrys Latex Green Dunlop, as well as RMM, Absoluteonsale also. I believe, Budgy can correct me if I am wrong Natura uses Latex Green in the lower layers of their mattresses. Not sure who else uses them. Aren't they the only ones making Dunlop now? I wonder if the mattresses from Sears used Dunlop that was as firm as they make now. If so I wonder how most people could take the firmness as a top layer. You had to really like a firm mattress. |
I meant I was curious about the 15 ILD dunlop. I haven't seen that particular firmness around except for the Celsion Talalay at SLAB. Thanks |
http://www.rockymountainmattress.com/talalaylatextoppermediumplush-p-86.html |
I don't really agree with you that LI is the best latex. From what I have seen and heard, most latex is about the same quality. LI might be more perfectly uniform in the way it looks - evenly placed holes, etc.. maybe. Don't get me wrong, I think LI is a good company, I'm just not sure their latex is really any better than anyone else's, I just think they have the best marketing campaign. I believe it was Budgy who stated that Natural latex is better than synthetic or blends like Talatech, and from what I have seen and heard I think that might be true. Or it may be that all are pretty close to equal in terms of practical usage. In terms of uniformity and "looking nice", LI might be the winner. So you are saying that your 24ILD Natural Talalay from RMM is very soft? And so you think the softer Talatech 14ILD from sleeplikeabear would be too soft (for me, I mean)? I am using a 32 ILD Talalay natural as my top layer sometimes and it feels too firm to me. Yet if I put the wool over it sometimes then I get lower back pain. So maybe the 24 is what I want? I'm just concerned that it might not be soft enough... that's why I was going to try the 14ILD; also someone in the foam industry recommended I try the 14ILD. You say the 24ILD from RMM is LI? I thought it was Latex Green... not sure though. Does it say on the site it is LI? Sorry to detour the thread, but this response of Leo's stimulated some questions and comments. |
Jim, as I said this is MHO, and only MHO. I only have experience with LI natural and blended talalay, and Latex Green dunlop. I have seen pictures of FBM, and some looks wonderful, and some not so much. Someone here also did a side by side of LI and FBM and gave his opinon of LI is better. It doesn't matter to me either way. Yes, the RMM natural talalay is definitely LI. Their dunop is LG. Several people have ordered it and have it and it does have it stamped on the latex side. Again, in MHO 24ILD is as soft as I want, this is my opinion and only for me. Some want softer, if it were any softer it would be smashed and of no use to me. I almost thought 24ILD was too soft after doing my hand test, LOL. But when your body weight is spread over the entired mattress with lots of Dunlop layers underneath it I now am happy!!! I hope this is not temporary like you have had Jim, and like I have had with the wool on top for a while. I took the Natura (Brylane Home) Dunlopillo soft blended latex off (I think it is 14-18ILD) and that really didn't do much for me. So now I am either going to have to find a soft cushier mattress cover, or keep using the plush polyester blanket still. So I would consider your wool pad could be a culprit of problems. But you are different from me, and my opinion may be of no value to some here. P.S. I have 1 1/2" of 24ILD LI blended talalay and 2" of 24ILD LI natural talalay, and I think I do like the natural better. Time will tell, and it smells just like my LI pillows, yummy. P.S.S. I forgot your question first time round, the LG 15ILD is marked as such, and yes I can see why you would not like the 32ILD of LG way too firm. But the 15ILD is fine as bottom layer. The other layers I have from OS was not marked and I do believe it is LG from the same similarities, and it is a bit softer, but it could be because if is thinner. The thinner the latex the softer it is, again IMHO. Disclaimer, LOL, this is only my opinion....... This message was modified May 24, 2010 by Leo3
|
Regarding their return policy, SleepEZ has a 30 day money back guarantee on their toppers: http://www.sleepez.com/mattresscomponents.htm. This message was modified May 25, 2010 by pianoman
|
|