My Foam By Mail / Foam Distributing Experience
Sep 17, 2008 11:00 PM
Location: Cypress, TX
Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Points: 41
My Foam By Mail (FBM) order arrived last Thursday, however we had hurricane Ike to deal with so I've been delayed in getting this post.  On the recommendation by several people on this forum, I weighed the foam before unwrapping the plastic wrap.  My order consisted of these East King (76x80) layers:

Two 1" HD36-HQ foam 2.8 PCF, 35 ILD ($82 for both)
5" Lux-HQ foam 2.8 PCF, 50 ILD ($201)

I ordered these costlier "High Quality (HQ)" variants via FBM's http://www.foamdistributing.com site.  Shipping was included in the price.  I received a confirmation e-mail, and within a few days a UPS tracking number.  Upon reciept, the outer box of the 5" Lux-HQ was beat up very badly, and I could tell that some papers had been torn off the outside.  However, the foam was wrapped completely in plastic wrap and incurred no damage.  The 2 1" HD36's were in a second box that was still intact. 

I removed the foam "cylinders" from their boxes and weighed them on the digital bathroom scale.  The Lux-HQ weighed in at 46.4 lbs and the 2 HD36's weighed in at 17.6 lbs.  According to my calculations, this is close to the 49 and 19.7 lbs respectively that these cuts should weigh.  The "Regular (R)" versions are 1.8 PCF so would weigh much less.

I have not measured the actual dimensions of the foam, but suffice it to say that the dimensions are more than enough to consitute E. King size.  They appear to meet or exceed the 76x80 spec.  Overall I am very satisfied with my FBM ordering experience.

I moved the rolls of foam upstairs into a free room and unwrapped them to let them expand and air out.  They stayed there during the hurricane.  After the hurricane, we were very fortunate to get power restored later on that day, so my parents who were not so lucky came to stay with us.  My dad is a big guy and has been complaining of neck and shoulder pain and his sagging 5 yr old pillowtop mattress, and my mother complains of back pain every day when she wakes up.  So, I asked them to try out the firm HQ foam bed.  We had the 5" Lux on the bottom, and the 2 1" HD36 on top, with a velour ticking cover, and a polyfill mattress pad over that, then the fitted sheet.  I wanted to see what their thoughts were on the firmness, and a told them about jankdc on the forum here sleeping on just a block of Lux after a back injury.  They slept great.  Both slept very soundly and had no pain when they woke up.  The second night one or both of them could have slept on the pillowtop queen in good condition in the guest room, but they both chose the foam stack.  They described the bed as "plenty firm" and did not experience pressure points or numbness.  They now want their own.

The big 5" block of Lux-HQ is FIRM, but different than what springs feel like.  If you lay flat on your back, your lower back does not touch.  The HD36 is a little softer, I would consider it medium-firm.  I intend for this stackup to comprise my base layers, to replace the function of innersprings.  It is too firm & rigid by itself, as I expected.  We placed the layers in the ticking cover along with a 3" 4# memory foam topper from Overstock.com over our existing Sealy box springs, fine tuned the positioning, then zipped up the 360 zipper.  We've slept on this rig for 2 nights now, and it is VERY comfortable.  The memory foam has a very different feel now that its on the very solid foam foundation.  I kind of like it.  My wife is very happy, sleeping well, and not feeling any stiffness or pain.  Same for me -- very little tossing and turning.  The bed feels flat and highly consistent no matter where you lay.  It is very comfortable.  We are officially done sleeping on the Sealy innerspring.

We are sticking with this for now, and I plan on ordering some latex from FBM to replace the memory foam.  2" of 32 ILD and 1" of 20 ILD.  I want to experience sleeping on this boingy Jello stuff.  If we don't like it, I can put the memory foam back in.  Trying it all out -- that's what this is all about, right?

This message was modified Sep 17, 2008 by LatencyMachine