This company in Connecticut was recommended by Phoenix and cazual on this forum. I met with the owner, Bob, who was very helpful in designing the following configuration for my queen-size latex mattress:
Bob zoned the layers with the idea that softer ILD should be below my shoulders and higher, firmer ILD below my hips, in order to allow the shoulders to sink in more, and to promote correct spine alignment. This is why the top layer has 32 inches of 19 ILD and the remainder at 28 ILD. The second layer similarly has a lower ILD of 24 at 36" from the top with the remainder at 32 ILD. The reason that the second layer "softer" zone is slightly longer than the top layer's "softer" zone by 4 inches is so that the slits are not right underneath each other. The core 6" height layer is constant throughout at 36 ILD. All layers are Talalay blended synthetic latex. My remaining dilemmas:
Curious as to what you all think of this design, the zoning element, the distinction in length between the top layer and the second layer soft zone to avoid the slits from being one on top of each other, the top layer split vs. solid, and using natural vs. synthetic latex for the top layer, please let me know what your thoughts are. This message was modified Nov 23, 2010 by rocco50
|
What I find interesting is the zoning changes at the rib cage for the second layer, what a great idea. This is the first I have seen for considering your rib cage wanting soft, but not too soft. Please let us know how it works for you in months to come, and years. |
Thanks |
I also filled out his form and got a custom config. I think it might be interesting to compare the differences. You didn't give your stats, but I am 5-10, 230lbs, and mostly a side sleeper. My config was very similar to yours - 3 layers, 11" total. My split point was at a different place (which is just a measure of where hips lie). My top 2" layer was 19 / 24 My middle 3" layer was 28 / 32 My bottom layer was 6" 40 As I say I assume the differences are weight, height and sleep position related... Steve |