I thought I FINALLY had my mattress problems solved. My mattress was PERFECT for the first 2 weeks... Then, about 3 nights ago it started to hurt a little. I figured it was just ME... (though I had not done a lot of work - I did a lot of back work the previous days and slept great through those days... But now for the past 3 nights I have had substantial back pain when sleeping. Not as much as before the new latex layer, but enough to make the last few hours of sleep a bit painful. So did the latex "break in" in 2 weeks and is now too soft for me? Or what? Or did the back work I did the previous week take a week to catch up to me? I think I might have to change my configuration after thinking I had it perfect... Ideas? I am very discouraged by this. I REALLY thought I had it right, finally; I had great comfort for 2 weeks! |
Who knows is probably right. It might be a contributing factor. I know that you did not pay a lot for the mattress, so I have always wondered if/how they cut corners somewhere. Cheaper steel? Less coils? One thing you have to remember is that it is not only the gauge of the coils but the quanity as well. It would be interesting if you could approximate the number of coils at some point. I also assume that they are interlaced? I think Budgy said once that the steel interlacing the coils is cheaper now than it use to be, so that might go bad more quickly. I noted a month or two ago that when I was trying out Sealy mattressses, the ones with higher gauge but significantly more coils, seemed firmer and more supportive than the ones with less thicker lower gauge coils. Having said all of that, I am sure that over the 3-4 week period that you have been using the new latex that the coils would not have changed much. So, I doubt this would explain the sudden reversal. However, if they are sagging more than they should (obviously they need to compress a bit with weight, otherwise what is the point), then it will probably be more difficult for you to ever get the right support. |
This message was modified Feb 23, 2010 by Leo3
|
So I changed my mattress last night. I put the 1and 3/4" Dunlop on the very bottom next to the springs. (This is the one that felt way too firm as a middle layer before, so I put it away for awhile.) Then the 3/4" latex I had before (maybe 34ILD) Then the 1" Talalay natural 32ILD from SleepEZ. I tossed and turned all night. It DID give me support! But it was just too danged hard. I could not feel comfortable - it felt like it was pushing back against me all night. I hated it. Finally got up and went to my wife's bed for the final 2 hours of sleep. Tonight believe it or not - and against my better judgment - I will try it again but with the wool mattress cover to see if that softens it enough without adding too much non-support. I know, it's never worked for long before, but... gotta try something... My theory is that this Dunlop layer might be good for me IF it broke in like the Talalay did! (softer would be better!) So if I could find a configuration to use the Dunlop in, then after a couple weeks or a month it might be perfect... But I could NOT tolerate it even for another night, the way it felt last night. Maybe the wool topper will help in this case. I will say that it did NOT hurt my back. That's one good thing about it! BUT, on the other hand, I could not sleep! |
Maybe you need to pull out the dunlop and walk around on it for a while to break it in. That way you are standing up, getting exercise, and the latex is getting broken in. Problem solved! If only.... |
I think latex does get softer, this seems to be my experience too. Yes, stomp on it as a trampoline! LOL. I would think, JMHO, the wool topper will make it that much harder. If I didn't put stretchy jersey sheets over it it wouldn't be so soft. Okay so maybe I need a wool topper, my problem would be solved. |
First of all, someone was asking about the spring count in my mattress. One place told me 390/Queen and someone else told me 420/Queen. I was told my Twin has 216 coils, that they are 12.5 gauge and double-tempered. Who knows? It is obvious that a lot of mattress salesmen just make stuff up half the time. But I am almost positive they are 12.5 gauge Bonnells because everyone said that, there was no disagreement on that point. So I slept for the 2nd night (this time around) with the Dunlop latex included in the configuration, on the bottom next to the springs. But this time I put the wool on top to try to soften it a bit. It was a little softer but still I did not sleep well. I tossed and turned all night, for the 2nd night. Way worse than the original configuration that was, say, "70%" good. This was like 40% good, or rather, 60% bad. It didn't feel "too hard" per se, it just felt as if the latex was pushing back too hard against me if that makes any sense to you. I have issues with my arms falling asleep and this was causing that as well (unless it was just coincidence). So tonight I took off the Dunlop. I'm going to try to sell it. (PM me!) I'm sure it's great for someone, but not for me! Maybe if it had been 1.5" like it was advertised as being, instead of 1.75", I might like it better or be able to use it, but at 1.75" it's just too firm. Not sure that even is the reason. For that matter, it may be mis-labeled and is really a Firm. I don't know, I just know it feels really firm to me and I can't tolerate it as part of my mattress. Okay. So I took everything off since I had to remove that bottom layer, and put everything back the same but without the bottom layer. So now I have only the 2 Talalay layers (1.75" total) on top of the springs, plus the wool cover. I have a feeling this isn't going to work, either, but I figured I may as well try it. By the way, part of the theory I have as to why last night's configuration didn't work is because it was just plain too much foam. It felt like when I was sleeping on pure foam with no springs; almost that bad. Before when my mattress was working I had around 2.25" of foam on top of the springs. So I will see if 1.75" is too little. Certainly 2.75 is too much, at least when part of it is this Dunlop piece. Maybe if I had an inch of soft latex on top, then it might not be too much. (?) If this configuration does not work I'm going back to the original configuration that was at "70% comfortable". I can't take another night at less than 70% comfort level! |
Dear Jim: I know I have been an advocate of getting to 85% comfort level and forgetting about it. But I was doing a little math after making this rather offhanded observation. There are 365 days in a year as everyone should know. If my little calculator is correct 15% of 365 is 54.75 nights. That's a lot of nights to be uncomfortable. That works out to 4.56 nights per month. Now a person might put up with a little over one night per week of bad sleep due to their mattress, but if you were unfortunate enough to get all of that months bad bed nights in a row, it would make a lousy week! So I think I'm going to revise that figure upward to 90 or 95%. That means a lot of us probably need to do a little bit of adjusting. I hope you can get your comfort level into the 90 percentile bracket! |
When I look at US-mattress the cheapest Sealy firm twin has 216 13 gauge coils, and the most expensive has 448 14 gauge. The expensive has foam around the edges as well (with no coils), so the effective coil count in the sleeping area is even higher (possibly 10-20% higher than 476). This is perhaps a question for Budgy. What would you recommend in terms of coils for someone like Jim looking for back support? Would 500 14 gauge coils provide more support than 216 12.5 gauge coils (in a twin)? I know the type of coils will matter as well, but assuming the same type of coil would there be much difference in terms of support? Or is the difference mainly comfort? This message was modified Feb 26, 2010 by sandman
|
the higher priced Sealy coils are also an Offset spring which hinge far more accurately than a bonnell coil. I don't see any reason why they also wouldn't hold up, but they probably are a more comfortable/conforming spring to use. Kind of an intermittent coil in terms of benefits between heavy bonnell springs and most pocket coils. More durable than a cheap pocket coil, not quite as conforming, but more so than a bonnell spring. |
Thanks Budgy. You didn't address part of my question, would say 448 14 guage coils provide more support than 216 12.5 gauge (in a twin)? What is the downside of having a lot less but thicker coils? Mainly comfort? This message was modified Feb 26, 2010 by sandman
|